Who
is Great?
A
sermon preached at Old South Congregational Church, United Church of Christ,
Hallowell, Maine, September 24, 2006.
Texts: Psalm 23
Mark 9:30-37
It’s hard not to get lured in. The effort to figure out who or what is the
greatest in almost every area known to humankind is pretty much taken for
granted. The greatest story ever
told. Mohamed Ali is the greatest of all
time—you don’t even need to mention of what.
Top ten lists abound—from different kinds of food to music to movies to
people (presidents, heroes, villains, etc.) to places to visit before you die
to, well, you name it. We suffer through
endless seasons of sports to find out which team is the greatest—and, it’s
almost never our team.
Who and what is great? Who is the greatest? We can help but to ask.
The disciples did the same
thing. As they were walking along,
following Jesus from place to place, they somehow—I’m sure it didn’t take
much—get involved in a conversation, an argument really, about who was the greatest. They are like students comparing test
scores. They are like athletes comparing
times or results in a meet or a match.
They are like historians arguing over the American events or
presidents. They are like ministers
discussing how many are in attendance at worship each week. They are anyone who has ever written a memo
containing the words “measurable outcomes.”
Which of the disciples is the star pupil? Who is the greatest?
It is easy to portray the disciples
as self-involved here, but maybe that is unfair. What if the outcome they were trying to
measure was faithfulness to their teacher?
What if they were arguing about who really understood Jesus, including
what Jesus was saying about death? We
know they were confused about Jesus’ passion predictions. Who wouldn’t be, really? We know, too, that they were not the only
followers to wonder what exactly is required of one who seeks to remain
faithful to Jesus. Maybe the
conversation about greatness grew out of a conversation about what it really
meant for them to stay beside Jesus all the way to Jerusalem.
The way of the cross is no less
confounding or frightening today. [“Seeing Things,” by Mary Hinkle at www.religion-online.org.]
And, this is what I found myself
struggling with this weekend as the Maine Conference gathered for its Annual
Meeting. The way of the cross is no less
confounding, no less confusing, no less humbling, no less frightening. It’s still a difficult and sometimes even a
dangerous path. And, along the way,
there is somehow the need sometimes to figure out who is the greatest, who is
following the correct path, who is the star pupil. There is somehow the need to say something
that indicates that perhaps God likes us best or that we are following God’s
path in a better way. We just can’t help
it. We want to be the ones that God
likes best.
This is first part of my reflection
that I would like to share with you this morning. There was, at times on Friday and Saturday, a
decided lack of humility and gentleness, a clear sense of lack of
understanding, a tone of not listening.
There was, at times, a sense that there were some who saw their own way
as the way most akin to God’s way. Yet,
God seemed noticeably absent.
There were times over the course of
a couple of days when people demonstrated a clear force of intention and
will. In a couple of debates, real
listening was hard to come by with a few offering amendments and such that were
clearly premeditated. There were moments
when I could not escape the feeling that there was a lack of full disclosure in
the process—that most came willing to debate and discuss with integrity and an
openness to a difference of perspective and opinion and then there were other
moments when a few displayed an obvious agenda that had been planned for
certain times and circumstances.
This weekend had its full share of
disappointing moments when the clergy and delegates showed their full humanity
in all of its imperfections. We can’t
help sometimes to think that our way is the right way and that God endorses our
particular plan.
But, in the midst of the full
display of humanity, there were many more moments of grace—like when two high
school young women sang the twenty-third psalm in front of the entire assembly,
when in the midst of a very difficult debate a minister went up to the
microphone and requested a moment of prayer, when slides were shown from around
the state to display the variety of the Maine Conference (the very first slide,
by the way, from Old South—the photo of the United Church of Christ symbol in
front of the organ pipes—but, there I go, seeming to suggest that perhaps the
fact that ours was the first slide indicated something . . . ). There was open and honest conversation about
where we are financially—a significant increase in the fellowship dues was
passed—and the sharing of ideas about how to be more creative in how we raise
the funds necessary to run the Conference.
There was also an interesting moment when the church that offered a
resolution encouraging the Conference to become a fair trade and fairly traded
Conference was met with a friendly amendment that substantially changed what
they had proposed. In some carefully
orchestrated Roberts Rules gymnastics, the meeting was suspended for a time so
that the church delegation and the individual could go out and fashion an
amended resolution reflecting the concerns of all, since they clearly were so
close in agreement. But, there will be time
to talk about that more later.
But, of course, the big debate was
over what was referred to as “The Resolution.”
Although there were four resolutions, one clearly overshadowed the
rest. And, I will focus on that
resolution for the rest of this morning’s sermon, to attempt to share with you
my reflection on why it passed. But,
first, I will begin by returning to a piece of this morning’s scripture
lesson: “When they passed through
Galilee, Jesus did not want anyone to know it; for he was teaching his
disciples, saying to them, ‘The Son of Man is to be betrayed into human hands,
and they will kill him, and three days
after being killed, he will rise again.’
But they did not understand what
he was saying and were afraid to ask him.”
Yesterday afternoon, as we gathered
to begin the debating process for a vote on the Resolution to Live in Covenant
and Dialogue Regarding the Quality and Equality of Marriage, we spent a full 45
minutes debating process and Roberts Rules of Order. Several hundred people were gathered in the
Grand Ballroom at Sunday River and there we were caught up in the process for
how we would dialogue and debate. Now,
some of that process was important and making sure we all knew how the process
was going to work was valuable, but 45 minutes worth went way beyond the usual. It became obvious to many in the room that we
were just procrastinating. Almost
everyone was anxious about how the debate was going to go. So, why not delay it? Maybe it would resolve itself.
It turns out that Old South isn’t alone in not
wanting to talk about things that cause discomfort. We aren’t alone in wanting to avoid subjects
that we assume will be divisive and difficult.
But, we really had to talk about this. It is important. We can’t hide it anymore. We know and Jesus knows that it is there and
we simply can’t pretend that gay marriage isn’t an issue.
Just because we are afraid or just because we don’t
understand, doesn’t mean that it’s okay to ignore those issues or subjects that
make us feel uneasy. The disciples were
afraid to ask because they didn’t understand.
But, that certainly didn’t resolve their confusion.
I have heard many of you make comments about your
discomfort over this issue, over the notion of the equality of marriage, but
perhaps the last part of this morning’s scripture passage may help you put it
in a more helpful context and will also shed some light on why the resolution
passed: “Jesus sat down, called the
Twelve, and said to them, ‘Whoever wants to be first must be last of all and
servant of all.’ Then he took a little
child and put it among them; and taking it in his arms, he said to them,
‘Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me, and whoever welcomes
me welcomes not me but the one who sent me.’”
In the first century, children were largely invisible
and ignored. By taking a child and
placing that child in the midst of them, in the middle of the twelve, and
claiming that such a child ought not only be welcomed, but welcomed in an
extravagant way, Jesus was making a radical statement. This statement was punctuated in an even more
dramatic form when he declared that “whoever welcomes one such child in my name
welcomes me and whoever welcomes me welcomes not me but the One who sent me.”
We are not simply called to look to the letter of
this story and to welcome children, but to also consider who this child in the
story represents—someone ignored, someone invisible And, then, we are called to consider those in
our community who are ignored, made to be invisible, those who despised,
disliked, mocked and humiliated. And, we
are called to welcome them.
During the debate regarding being in covenant and
dialogue regarding the quality and equality of marriage, there was quite a lot
of debate and discussion. One man from
Millinockett talked about the people that his church had already lost and the
others that they are likely to lose if the Conference voted for such a
resolution. A pastor from a Kennebec
Valley Association church talked about the slow, but steady, progress that her
church was making in beginning a conversation like no other they had had
before. She worried, though, that the
Resolution would be too much too soon and that her church, too, would lose
members.
And, then a man from another Kennebec Valley Church,
a man that I know, a faithful and active church member for many years, got up
to talk. He talked about his 27-year
relationship with another man and the children that they had raised
together. When his partner died, Bill
and the children went to the funeral home to make plans for the burial, which
also included the paperwork that would be filed with the state. The funeral home director looked at them and
asked for the name of a wife or an ex-wife to be listed. The children looked at Bill and then told the
funeral home director that Bill was the man’s partner and that he should be
listed. The funeral home director said
he couldn’t do that—basically, that that relationship didn’t count.
Though Bill tried not to let it bother him, it
did. And it still does.
I don’t know where we will end up on the subject of
gay marriage, on the subject of the equality of marriage, but I can’t look at
Bill, and so many others like him, and tell him that I won’t even talk about
this issue. I couldn’t look at Bill and
tell him that my church isn’t ready or that I’m afraid of losing members. I couldn’t look at Bill and tell him that he
needs to stay invisible a little longer.
I couldn’t look at Bill and tell him that I can’t even talk about
this. I just couldn’t—even though I am
afraid, even though I don’t fully understand.
This is part of what Annual Meeting is like. Though we arrange ourselves in this confusing
and exasperating system where we gather to vote on resolutions that aren’t
binding, that we gather together in this weird configuration that is shared by
no other church, there is something powerful in being together in this way—in
being the church and knowing that God is in the midst of us.
That is why the Resolution passed and passed
convincingly. It’s not all about
policies and theories. It is not all
about traditions or my level of comfort or discomfort about something I don’t
fully understand.
This Resolution is about real, live
people. Some are friends. Some are family. Some are fellow church members. Some are complete strangers looking for a
place of welcome, looking for a place where they may worship God in the midst
of others who are willing to take seriously Jesus’ almost constant
refrain: Do not be afraid.
The Resolution calls for us to be
“in covenant and dialogue regarding the quality and equality of marriage.” Through my faith in my God, I have confidence
that we can do that.
Who is great? God is great.
And God will lead us through.
Amen.